<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15773</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act regarding deductions for remuneration paid to managerial staff and the allowability of deductions for contributions made to an approved gratuity fund. The court upheld the decisions of the Appellate Tribunal, finding that the payments were reasonable and not based on extra commercial considerations. It held that both deductions were admissible, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15773</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act regarding deductions for remuneration paid to managerial staff and the allowability of deductions for contributions made to an approved gratuity fund. The court upheld the decisions of the Appellate Tribunal, finding that the payments were reasonable and not based on extra commercial considerations. It held that both deductions were admissible, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>