https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277735 The High Court held that the Civil Court and the Company Law Board have concurrent jurisdiction in disputes related to redeemable preference shares under the Companies Act, 1956. The trial Court's dismissal of the suit based on the Company Law Board's jurisdiction was overturned. The case was remanded to the District & Sessions Judge for further proceedings in the Civil Court, emphasizing that disputed factual issues should be resolved by the Civil Court. en-us Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:19:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277735 The High Court held that the Civil Court and the Company Law Board have concurrent jurisdiction in disputes related to redeemable preference shares under the Companies Act, 1956. The trial Court's dismissal of the suit based on the Company Law Board's jurisdiction was overturned. The case was remanded to the District & Sessions Judge for further proceedings in the Civil Court, emphasizing that disputed factual issues should be resolved by the Civil Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277735