<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that interest income from delayed compensation for acquired ancestral agricultural land should be taxed in the hands of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) rather than the individual. This decision aligned with previous ITAT rulings and Hindu Law principles governing ancestral property, establishing that income derived from ancestral property belongs to the HUF.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that interest income from delayed compensation for acquired ancestral agricultural land should be taxed in the hands of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) rather than the individual. This decision aligned with previous ITAT rulings and Hindu Law principles governing ancestral property, establishing that income derived from ancestral property belongs to the HUF.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>