https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372307 A stay order should not be revisited on the same facts unless there is a substantial change in circumstances, and the Tribunal found no such change because the later developments were only variations in figures and related details. Continued stay of recovery was also refused because the assessee had not complied with the earlier deposit conditions, the outstanding demand remained recoverable, and the materials did not establish a fresh prima facie case or balance of convenience. The demand arose from assessments involving denial of exemption on regular receipts and additions linked to capitation fees and alleged breach of charitable conditions. The stay applications were therefore rejected and recovery was not further stayed. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:17:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372307 A stay order should not be revisited on the same facts unless there is a substantial change in circumstances, and the Tribunal found no such change because the later developments were only variations in figures and related details. Continued stay of recovery was also refused because the assessee had not complied with the earlier deposit conditions, the outstanding demand remained recoverable, and the materials did not establish a fresh prima facie case or balance of convenience. The demand arose from assessments involving denial of exemption on regular receipts and additions linked to capitation fees and alleged breach of charitable conditions. The stay applications were therefore rejected and recovery was not further stayed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372307