<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1076 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay applications, emphasizing the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with previous directions and lack of substantial changes to warrant re-examination. The applicant&#039;s conduct and financial position were deemed insufficient to justify a stay on the outstanding demand. Partial stay on the outstanding demand was granted subject to specific conditions, but the applications were ultimately dismissed due to non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:17:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1076 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay applications, emphasizing the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with previous directions and lack of substantial changes to warrant re-examination. The applicant&#039;s conduct and financial position were deemed insufficient to justify a stay on the outstanding demand. Partial stay on the outstanding demand was granted subject to specific conditions, but the applications were ultimately dismissed due to non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>