<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1059 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions with modifications to the disallowance rates for expenses related to exempt income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent treatment of income from share transactions and the proper application of Rule 8D and Section 14A based on the availability of own funds and the nature of expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1059 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions with modifications to the disallowance rates for expenses related to exempt income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent treatment of income from share transactions and the proper application of Rule 8D and Section 14A based on the availability of own funds and the nature of expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>