<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1051 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372282</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the disallowance of deduction of interest expenditure under Sec. 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under Sec. 24(b) for the interest expenditure related to the residential property acquisition. The matter was directed back to the Assessing Officer for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1051 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372282</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the disallowance of deduction of interest expenditure under Sec. 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under Sec. 24(b) for the interest expenditure related to the residential property acquisition. The matter was directed back to the Assessing Officer for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>