<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1050 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the AO&#039;s additions under sections 69C and 68 of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the transactions and criticized the AO for inadequate investigations and denial of cross-examination opportunities. The Tribunal emphasized principles of natural justice and cited precedents supporting the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:16:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1050 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the AO&#039;s additions under sections 69C and 68 of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the transactions and criticized the AO for inadequate investigations and denial of cross-examination opportunities. The Tribunal emphasized principles of natural justice and cited precedents supporting the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>