https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15767 The court ruled in favor of the trust, emphasizing that promoting a linguistic group does not equate to promoting a particular religion or caste. It highlighted the diverse membership of the trust and rejected the Revenue's argument that the trust primarily catered to a specific religious community. The court underscored that speaking a language does not determine one's religion or caste and concluded that the trust was entitled to exemptions under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:49:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15767 The court ruled in favor of the trust, emphasizing that promoting a linguistic group does not equate to promoting a particular religion or caste. It highlighted the diverse membership of the trust and rejected the Revenue's argument that the trust primarily catered to a specific religious community. The court underscored that speaking a language does not determine one's religion or caste and concluded that the trust was entitled to exemptions under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15767