https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372274 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the Custom House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The Tribunal held that the failure to adhere to the prescribed time limit invalidated the revocation order, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the time limits set in Circular No. 09/2010-Cus. The appellant successfully argued that penalizing the firm for the actions of an individual partner was unjustified, leading to the reinstatement of the CHA license. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 07:26:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372274 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the Custom House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The Tribunal held that the failure to adhere to the prescribed time limit invalidated the revocation order, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the time limits set in Circular No. 09/2010-Cus. The appellant successfully argued that penalizing the firm for the actions of an individual partner was unjustified, leading to the reinstatement of the CHA license. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372274