<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1035 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services provided by an overseas service provider for organizing events. The services were deemed to be Event Management Services, not Business Support Services, and were found not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism. The penalties under sections 76 &amp;amp; 78 were not discussed in detail, and the demand for service tax was considered time-barred. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 29/11/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1035 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services provided by an overseas service provider for organizing events. The services were deemed to be Event Management Services, not Business Support Services, and were found not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism. The penalties under sections 76 &amp;amp; 78 were not discussed in detail, and the demand for service tax was considered time-barred. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 29/11/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>