https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372264 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellant's appeal regarding the valuation of goods for consumption. The appellant failed to include the required 15% mark up in the declared price of repacked goods, contrary to Central Excise Valuation Rules. The Tribunal found the appellant's arguments regarding the interpretation of rules and limitation period to be without merit. Therefore, the demands for the differential duty, interest, and penalties were confirmed by the adjudicating authority. The judgment was pronounced on 18.12.2018. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2020 10:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372264 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellant's appeal regarding the valuation of goods for consumption. The appellant failed to include the required 15% mark up in the declared price of repacked goods, contrary to Central Excise Valuation Rules. The Tribunal found the appellant's arguments regarding the interpretation of rules and limitation period to be without merit. Therefore, the demands for the differential duty, interest, and penalties were confirmed by the adjudicating authority. The judgment was pronounced on 18.12.2018. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372264