<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1030 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372261</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that cinder is not an excisable product and is considered a non-excisable commodity based on legal precedents and circulars. The tribunal set aside the demand of duty on the clearance of cinders and allowed the appeal with consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1030 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372261</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that cinder is not an excisable product and is considered a non-excisable commodity based on legal precedents and circulars. The tribunal set aside the demand of duty on the clearance of cinders and allowed the appeal with consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>