https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372260 The Tribunal partly allowed the Appeals in a case involving Central Excise duty liability, denial of cenvat credit, and penalties. The appellant Company contested the denial of cenvat credit and penalties imposed for alleged clandestine activities. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal and emphasized the need for substantial evidence. Considering the appellant's payment of duty and lack of intent for tax evasion, the Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit and reduced penalties imposed on the Company and its Directors. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:51:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372260 The Tribunal partly allowed the Appeals in a case involving Central Excise duty liability, denial of cenvat credit, and penalties. The appellant Company contested the denial of cenvat credit and penalties imposed for alleged clandestine activities. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal and emphasized the need for substantial evidence. Considering the appellant's payment of duty and lack of intent for tax evasion, the Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit and reduced penalties imposed on the Company and its Directors. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372260