<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15764</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside the order of the appropriate authority dated January 17, 1995, due to the authority&#039;s failure to consider material evidence and unjustifiably dismissing evidence. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the purchase order and granting the relief sought in the petition, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15764</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside the order of the appropriate authority dated January 17, 1995, due to the authority&#039;s failure to consider material evidence and unjustifiably dismissing evidence. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the purchase order and granting the relief sought in the petition, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>