<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1027 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372258</link>
    <description>The case involved appeals challenging duty liability on clandestinely produced &#039;CTD bars&#039; and penalties under the Central Excise Act. The primary issue was unauthorized utilization of raw materials without proper records, leading to duty liability and penalties. The adjudicating authority found goods were removed without accounting, justifying duty imposition. The appellant&#039;s justifications for high fuel and electricity consumption were disregarded, and lack of personal hearing for one appellant violated natural justice. The judgment highlighted procedural irregularities, setting aside the order and remanding for fresh adjudication to ensure a fair hearing and compliance with natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1027 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372258</link>
      <description>The case involved appeals challenging duty liability on clandestinely produced &#039;CTD bars&#039; and penalties under the Central Excise Act. The primary issue was unauthorized utilization of raw materials without proper records, leading to duty liability and penalties. The adjudicating authority found goods were removed without accounting, justifying duty imposition. The appellant&#039;s justifications for high fuel and electricity consumption were disregarded, and lack of personal hearing for one appellant violated natural justice. The judgment highlighted procedural irregularities, setting aside the order and remanding for fresh adjudication to ensure a fair hearing and compliance with natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>