<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1014 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372245</link>
    <description>The Court addressed recovery proceedings against legal heirs under the KVAT Act, emphasizing a legal heir&#039;s liability limited to the deceased&#039;s estate. The petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with conditions of a stay petition led to continued recovery proceedings. The challenge to a notice from the Tahsildar regarding inheritance and liability under Section 26(7) was considered. The Court directed the District Collector to promptly determine the petitioner&#039;s liability, urging timely adjudication for clarity. The Writ Petition was disposed with instructions to defer coercive steps until the District Collector&#039;s orders, ensuring a fair resolution of the petitioner&#039;s liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1014 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372245</link>
      <description>The Court addressed recovery proceedings against legal heirs under the KVAT Act, emphasizing a legal heir&#039;s liability limited to the deceased&#039;s estate. The petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with conditions of a stay petition led to continued recovery proceedings. The challenge to a notice from the Tahsildar regarding inheritance and liability under Section 26(7) was considered. The Court directed the District Collector to promptly determine the petitioner&#039;s liability, urging timely adjudication for clarity. The Writ Petition was disposed with instructions to defer coercive steps until the District Collector&#039;s orders, ensuring a fair resolution of the petitioner&#039;s liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>