<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1012 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372243</link>
    <description>The court upheld the judgment of the learned Single Judge, refusing to interfere with the penalty proceedings under Article 226. The court found that the grounds for interference were not available and left all other contentions open for the statutory appeal. The writ appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1012 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372243</link>
      <description>The court upheld the judgment of the learned Single Judge, refusing to interfere with the penalty proceedings under Article 226. The court found that the grounds for interference were not available and left all other contentions open for the statutory appeal. The writ appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>