<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1011 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372242</link>
    <description>Assessment orders under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 were subject to statutory appeal under section 69, with further appeal and revision under sections 71 and 72. The court reiterated that writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be invoked where the dispute can be examined by the appellate authority, especially when the challenge raises questions of fact and law and none of the recognised exceptions applies. The availability of pre-deposit linked statutory remedies was not treated as a ground to bypass the appellate scheme, and the writ petition was held not maintainable, leaving the petitioner to pursue the prescribed appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1011 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372242</link>
      <description>Assessment orders under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 were subject to statutory appeal under section 69, with further appeal and revision under sections 71 and 72. The court reiterated that writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be invoked where the dispute can be examined by the appellate authority, especially when the challenge raises questions of fact and law and none of the recognised exceptions applies. The availability of pre-deposit linked statutory remedies was not treated as a ground to bypass the appellate scheme, and the writ petition was held not maintainable, leaving the petitioner to pursue the prescribed appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>