https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372242 The court held that the petitioner's challenge to the assessment under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 for the years 2010-2011 to 2014-2015 was not maintainable through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution without first availing the statutory remedy of appeal provided under the Act. Emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction, the court dismissed the writ petition and advised the petitioner to pursue the appeal process under the Act within the specified time limits. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:25:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372242 The court held that the petitioner's challenge to the assessment under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 for the years 2010-2011 to 2014-2015 was not maintainable through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution without first availing the statutory remedy of appeal provided under the Act. Emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction, the court dismissed the writ petition and advised the petitioner to pursue the appeal process under the Act within the specified time limits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372242