<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1332 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277722</link>
    <description>Lands granted by the Government for an industrial project were held to be assigned under the Rules for the Assignment of Government Lands in Development Areas for Industrial Purposes, not under the Kerala Land Assignment Rules, 1964, because the pattas, Government orders and mode of grant showed a heritable industrial assignment and the special rules permitted relaxation of other restrictions. The lands were also outside the ceiling provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 because they were Government lands on the relevant cut-off date; exemption notifications could not validate proceedings where the Chapter itself did not apply. The ceiling order directing surrender of excess land was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1332 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277722</link>
      <description>Lands granted by the Government for an industrial project were held to be assigned under the Rules for the Assignment of Government Lands in Development Areas for Industrial Purposes, not under the Kerala Land Assignment Rules, 1964, because the pattas, Government orders and mode of grant showed a heritable industrial assignment and the special rules permitted relaxation of other restrictions. The lands were also outside the ceiling provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 because they were Government lands on the relevant cut-off date; exemption notifications could not validate proceedings where the Chapter itself did not apply. The ceiling order directing surrender of excess land was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>