<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1411 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277724</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay 25% of the disputed tax within three weeks, allowing them to submit objections and receive a personal hearing for reconsideration of the assessment order. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the writ petition without further court intervention. The writ petition was disposed of with specified conditions, no costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1411 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277724</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay 25% of the disputed tax within three weeks, allowing them to submit objections and receive a personal hearing for reconsideration of the assessment order. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the writ petition without further court intervention. The writ petition was disposed of with specified conditions, no costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>