<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1644 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277727</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC held that the petitioner, inheriting properties from his deceased father, is liable to pay the penalty under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The penalty order, returned unclaimed after the father&#039;s demise, was upheld, and the petitioner was granted six weeks to appeal the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1644 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277727</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC held that the petitioner, inheriting properties from his deceased father, is liable to pay the penalty under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The penalty order, returned unclaimed after the father&#039;s demise, was upheld, and the petitioner was granted six weeks to appeal the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>