<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1625 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded issues of unsecured loans, unexplained election expenditure, unexplained investment in land, and unexplained investment in Fixed Deposit Receipts back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The addition on account of agricultural income was upheld as determined by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, necessitating further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1625 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded issues of unsecured loans, unexplained election expenditure, unexplained investment in land, and unexplained investment in Fixed Deposit Receipts back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The addition on account of agricultural income was upheld as determined by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, necessitating further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>