https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15752 Reassessment proceedings under sections 147(a) and 148 were not stopped in writ jurisdiction because the alleged omission to disclose the earlier wealth-tax assessment and valuation raised a debatable question for the assessing and appellate authorities. Since further enquiry was required, the court held that no case for threshold interference under Article 226 was made out. The assessee was left free to raise all objections before the assessing authority, and the reassessment notice was sustained. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:12:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15752 Reassessment proceedings under sections 147(a) and 148 were not stopped in writ jurisdiction because the alleged omission to disclose the earlier wealth-tax assessment and valuation raised a debatable question for the assessing and appellate authorities. Since further enquiry was required, the court held that no case for threshold interference under Article 226 was made out. The assessee was left free to raise all objections before the assessing authority, and the reassessment notice was sustained. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15752