https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372232 The case involved an allegation of profiteering against the Respondent for not passing on the benefit of tax reduction post-GST implementation. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering's report confirmed no tax rate reduction on the product, leading to the dismissal of the application. The judgment concluded that the Respondent did not contravene Section 171 of the CGST Act, resulting in the application's dismissal. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372232 The case involved an allegation of profiteering against the Respondent for not passing on the benefit of tax reduction post-GST implementation. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering's report confirmed no tax rate reduction on the product, leading to the dismissal of the application. The judgment concluded that the Respondent did not contravene Section 171 of the CGST Act, resulting in the application's dismissal. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372232