<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372222</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that bank guarantee commission payments were not subject to tax deduction at source under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The court agreed that the payments did not constitute commission but rather bank charges for services, distinguishing them from typical commission payments. As a result, the Income Tax Appeal was dismissed, with the court finding no legal question arising from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372222</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that bank guarantee commission payments were not subject to tax deduction at source under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act. The court agreed that the payments did not constitute commission but rather bank charges for services, distinguishing them from typical commission payments. As a result, the Income Tax Appeal was dismissed, with the court finding no legal question arising from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>