<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 984 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowances under Section 14A and ad-hoc disallowance of expenses. It emphasized the absence of exempt income, investments made from own funds, and lack of specific defects in expenses. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of specific findings by the AO, which were lacking in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 984 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowances under Section 14A and ad-hoc disallowance of expenses. It emphasized the absence of exempt income, investments made from own funds, and lack of specific defects in expenses. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of specific findings by the AO, which were lacking in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>