<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 981 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372212</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order. It was held that Section 56(2)(vii)(c) of the IT Act was not applicable as shares were allotted uniformly to existing shareholders. Section 17 was deemed inapplicable as the shares were not treated as perquisites. The A.O. was directed to grant credit for TDS on salary and interest to the assessee. The order was pronounced on 07/12/2018, with both Revenue appeals being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 981 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372212</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order. It was held that Section 56(2)(vii)(c) of the IT Act was not applicable as shares were allotted uniformly to existing shareholders. Section 17 was deemed inapplicable as the shares were not treated as perquisites. The A.O. was directed to grant credit for TDS on salary and interest to the assessee. The order was pronounced on 07/12/2018, with both Revenue appeals being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>