<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 972 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372203</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the provisions of Section 68 were erroneously invoked by the AO in a tax case. The tribunal concluded that the transactions were legitimate barter transactions involving the exchange of shares without any cash flow. Consequently, the addition made under Section 68 was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 972 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372203</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the provisions of Section 68 were erroneously invoked by the AO in a tax case. The tribunal concluded that the transactions were legitimate barter transactions involving the exchange of shares without any cash flow. Consequently, the addition made under Section 68 was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>