<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 963 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372194</link>
    <description>A company petition may be stayed where a previously instituted civil suit between the same parties involves the same core transaction and the same matter in issue directly and substantially. Section 10 CPC is ordinarily framed for suits, but the controlling consideration is whether parallel proceedings would risk inconsistent findings on overlapping facts and issues. Where both proceedings turn on the same MOU, alleged transfer and management acts, and allegations of fraud, oppression and mismanagement, the tribunal may rely on its inherent power under the Companies Law Board Regulations to prevent abuse of process and conflicting decisions. The stay was therefore upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:07:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 963 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372194</link>
      <description>A company petition may be stayed where a previously instituted civil suit between the same parties involves the same core transaction and the same matter in issue directly and substantially. Section 10 CPC is ordinarily framed for suits, but the controlling consideration is whether parallel proceedings would risk inconsistent findings on overlapping facts and issues. Where both proceedings turn on the same MOU, alleged transfer and management acts, and allegations of fraud, oppression and mismanagement, the tribunal may rely on its inherent power under the Companies Law Board Regulations to prevent abuse of process and conflicting decisions. The stay was therefore upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>