https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372172 The Tribunal upheld the classification of services as the supply of tangible goods rather than convention services, finding the appellant liable for Service Tax on the temporary supply of goods. The demand for Service Tax was deemed justified due to the appellant's failure to disclose the value of these services to the Department. The extended limitation period was applied as the appellant did not disclose the provision of services, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the Tribunal. en-us Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372172 The Tribunal upheld the classification of services as the supply of tangible goods rather than convention services, finding the appellant liable for Service Tax on the temporary supply of goods. The demand for Service Tax was deemed justified due to the appellant's failure to disclose the value of these services to the Department. The extended limitation period was applied as the appellant did not disclose the provision of services, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372172