<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 935 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372166</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing that the appeal process under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act should have been followed. The court found the writ petition to be an attempt to circumvent the appeal process and noted that the limitation period had expired six years prior. Consequently, the court deemed the writ petition as a subterfuge to bypass the limitation hurdle and dismissed it in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 935 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372166</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing that the appeal process under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act should have been followed. The court found the writ petition to be an attempt to circumvent the appeal process and noted that the limitation period had expired six years prior. Consequently, the court deemed the writ petition as a subterfuge to bypass the limitation hurdle and dismissed it in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>