<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 932 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the binding legal precedent supporting the admissibility of CENVAT credit based on debit notes and highlighted the sufficiency of the submitted evidence in justifying the credit claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:04:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 932 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the binding legal precedent supporting the admissibility of CENVAT credit based on debit notes and highlighted the sufficiency of the submitted evidence in justifying the credit claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>