https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15738 A fresh writ petition was not maintainable where the Tribunal's order had already attained finality through the available statutory reference process and further challenge before the Supreme Court had failed. Repeated miscellaneous applications seeking recall of the same order were rejected, and the court treated the new writ as a third round of litigation over a concluded matter. The petition was therefore held to be misconceived and an abuse of the process of court, and was dismissed. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15738 A fresh writ petition was not maintainable where the Tribunal's order had already attained finality through the available statutory reference process and further challenge before the Supreme Court had failed. Repeated miscellaneous applications seeking recall of the same order were rejected, and the court treated the new writ as a third round of litigation over a concluded matter. The petition was therefore held to be misconceived and an abuse of the process of court, and was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15738