<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 38 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15735</link>
    <description>The court found that the petitioner had fully and truly disclosed all material facts necessary for assessment, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to apply the correct legal principles did not justify reopening the assessments under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the court quashed all notices issued under section 148 and allowed the petitions, ruling in favor of the petitioner with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 38 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15735</link>
      <description>The court found that the petitioner had fully and truly disclosed all material facts necessary for assessment, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to apply the correct legal principles did not justify reopening the assessments under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the court quashed all notices issued under section 148 and allowed the petitions, ruling in favor of the petitioner with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>