https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277696 The High Court overturned the eviction decision based on errors in legal reasoning. It found that post-dissolution, one partner continuing to use the premises for personal business did not constitute subletting. The Court emphasized Indian legal principles over English law and highlighted the failure to address the crucial issue of subletting to a different firm. A fresh hearing was ordered to properly examine this issue and ensure all relevant aspects are considered before reaching a decision. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:44:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277696 The High Court overturned the eviction decision based on errors in legal reasoning. It found that post-dissolution, one partner continuing to use the premises for personal business did not constitute subletting. The Court emphasized Indian legal principles over English law and highlighted the failure to address the crucial issue of subletting to a different firm. A fresh hearing was ordered to properly examine this issue and ensure all relevant aspects are considered before reaching a decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Jul 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277696