<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 917 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372148</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The tribunal found that the rejection of the application for registration under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act was erroneous. It directed the assessee to provide necessary details and clarifications, emphasizing procedural fairness and the importance of affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 917 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372148</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The tribunal found that the rejection of the application for registration under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act was erroneous. It directed the assessee to provide necessary details and clarifications, emphasizing procedural fairness and the importance of affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>