<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 908 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of deduction claimed under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that for claiming deduction under section 54, the new property must be owned by the assessee or have legal title over it. Since the new property was not purchased in the name of the assessee but in the name of the wife and adult daughter, the deduction was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 908 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of deduction claimed under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that for claiming deduction under section 54, the new property must be owned by the assessee or have legal title over it. Since the new property was not purchased in the name of the assessee but in the name of the wife and adult daughter, the deduction was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>