<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 667 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete ad hoc disallowances and the addition for belated PF and ESIC payments. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that expenses must be wholly for business purposes to be allowable under section 37(1) of the Act, citing commercial expediency and direct benefit to trade as crucial factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 667 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete ad hoc disallowances and the addition for belated PF and ESIC payments. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that expenses must be wholly for business purposes to be allowable under section 37(1) of the Act, citing commercial expediency and direct benefit to trade as crucial factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>