<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 895 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372126</link>
    <description>The Applicant was found not eligible for the exemption under Sr. No. 13 of Notification No. 12/2017 as they acted as an intermediary in religious ceremonies. Additionally, the Applicant, operating as an Electronic Commerce Operator, was mandated to register under section 22/24 of the CGST Act, regardless of turnover. The GST liability was determined to be on the commission retained by the Applicant, not the total booking value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 895 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372126</link>
      <description>The Applicant was found not eligible for the exemption under Sr. No. 13 of Notification No. 12/2017 as they acted as an intermediary in religious ceremonies. Additionally, the Applicant, operating as an Electronic Commerce Operator, was mandated to register under section 22/24 of the CGST Act, regardless of turnover. The GST liability was determined to be on the commission retained by the Applicant, not the total booking value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>