<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 887 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372118</link>
    <description>Repeated acknowledgments through promissory notes, cheques, confirmations and e-mails were treated as sufficient to show limitation was not fatal and that the right to initiate insolvency had been exercised within time. The tribunal found the advances had the commercial effect of borrowing, creating financial debt supported by time-value-of-money consideration, agreed interest and repayment terms. It also accepted documentary proof of default without information utility records, upheld a joint application by multiple financial creditors, treated a fresh power of attorney as curing authorisation defects, and held that internal articles-based restrictions could not be used by the debtor to avoid liability after accepting and using the funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:35:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 887 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372118</link>
      <description>Repeated acknowledgments through promissory notes, cheques, confirmations and e-mails were treated as sufficient to show limitation was not fatal and that the right to initiate insolvency had been exercised within time. The tribunal found the advances had the commercial effect of borrowing, creating financial debt supported by time-value-of-money consideration, agreed interest and repayment terms. It also accepted documentary proof of default without information utility records, upheld a joint application by multiple financial creditors, treated a fresh power of attorney as curing authorisation defects, and held that internal articles-based restrictions could not be used by the debtor to avoid liability after accepting and using the funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>