https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372111 The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Section 114(iii) on the appellant company and the Director, as well as penalties under Section 114AA on the Director, citing penalties already imposed by the DGFT. The decision stressed the importance of avoiding double jeopardy, ensuring proportionate penalties, and clarifying jurisdictional matters in cases involving export incentives and DEPB irregularities. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372111 The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Section 114(iii) on the appellant company and the Director, as well as penalties under Section 114AA on the Director, citing penalties already imposed by the DGFT. The decision stressed the importance of avoiding double jeopardy, ensuring proportionate penalties, and clarifying jurisdictional matters in cases involving export incentives and DEPB irregularities. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372111