https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372109 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the Adjudicating Authority's non-compliance with the remand order. The Tribunal found the Authority's actions to be in defiance of its directives, indicating a lack of consideration and non-application of mind. Due to the case's age and the Authority's failure to follow directions, the Tribunal opted not to remand for fresh consideration. This decision highlights the significance of Adjudicating Authorities adhering to higher judicial forum directives and exercising diligence in re-adjudication. en-us Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372109 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the Adjudicating Authority's non-compliance with the remand order. The Tribunal found the Authority's actions to be in defiance of its directives, indicating a lack of consideration and non-application of mind. Due to the case's age and the Authority's failure to follow directions, the Tribunal opted not to remand for fresh consideration. This decision highlights the significance of Adjudicating Authorities adhering to higher judicial forum directives and exercising diligence in re-adjudication. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372109