<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 872 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services as Franchise Services, denied export benefits for the period before 27.02.2010, confirmed the invocation of the extended period of limitation, and upheld the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal by the revenue challenging the cum tax benefit was dismissed, and the appellants were allowed to avail CENVAT Credit on input services used for providing output services if otherwise admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 872 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services as Franchise Services, denied export benefits for the period before 27.02.2010, confirmed the invocation of the extended period of limitation, and upheld the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal by the revenue challenging the cum tax benefit was dismissed, and the appellants were allowed to avail CENVAT Credit on input services used for providing output services if otherwise admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>