<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 588 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277690</link>
    <description>A transferred motor vehicle does not keep the original insurance policy alive unless the policy is transferred in the prescribed manner or a fresh contract is obtained; absent notice to the insurer and compliance with Section 103A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the insurer is not liable to indemnify the transferee. The Court also treated the accident as involving contributory negligence, fixing liability at 60 per cent on the bus driver and 40 per cent on the lorry driver. On compensation, the award in one claim was enhanced because the original amount was inadequate in light of burn injuries, hospitalisation and loss of an academic year, while the other award was left undisturbed as reasonable on the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 588 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277690</link>
      <description>A transferred motor vehicle does not keep the original insurance policy alive unless the policy is transferred in the prescribed manner or a fresh contract is obtained; absent notice to the insurer and compliance with Section 103A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the insurer is not liable to indemnify the transferee. The Court also treated the accident as involving contributory negligence, fixing liability at 60 per cent on the bus driver and 40 per cent on the lorry driver. On compensation, the award in one claim was enhanced because the original amount was inadequate in light of burn injuries, hospitalisation and loss of an academic year, while the other award was left undisturbed as reasonable on the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>