<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 852 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372083</link>
    <description>Rice bucket elevators and rice conveyors specially designed for use with rice milling machinery were classified under heading 8437 as machinery used in the milling industry, not under heading 8428 as general lifting, handling or loading equipment. Applying Section Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the principal function of the composite rice-milling setup governed classification, and the HSN explanatory notes could not override the clear tariff notes. On that basis, the duty demand, interest and penalty founded on heading 8428 were held unsustainable, and the impugned classification order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 852 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372083</link>
      <description>Rice bucket elevators and rice conveyors specially designed for use with rice milling machinery were classified under heading 8437 as machinery used in the milling industry, not under heading 8428 as general lifting, handling or loading equipment. Applying Section Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the principal function of the composite rice-milling setup governed classification, and the HSN explanatory notes could not override the clear tariff notes. On that basis, the duty demand, interest and penalty founded on heading 8428 were held unsustainable, and the impugned classification order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>