https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372079 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals against Orders-in-Appeal concerning abatement claims for non-production of pan masala without tobacco and nicotine. The disputes centered on machine specifications, closure duration for abatement eligibility, and interpretation of rules governing abatement payments. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decisions, emphasizing compliance with rules, proper verification, and lack of grounds for denying abatement. The judgment underscored the importance of adherence to regulations in claiming abatements and ruled in favor of the Respondent, affirming the Deputy Commissioner's verification and sanctioning of claims. en-us Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:26:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372079 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals against Orders-in-Appeal concerning abatement claims for non-production of pan masala without tobacco and nicotine. The disputes centered on machine specifications, closure duration for abatement eligibility, and interpretation of rules governing abatement payments. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decisions, emphasizing compliance with rules, proper verification, and lack of grounds for denying abatement. The judgment underscored the importance of adherence to regulations in claiming abatements and ruled in favor of the Respondent, affirming the Deputy Commissioner's verification and sanctioning of claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372079