https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372077 The Kerala High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging penalty and recovery proceedings arising from detention of couriered goods and their later destruction in a fire, because an efficacious statutory remedy was available under Section 55 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Court accepted the objection that the petitioner should pursue the prescribed appellate process and found no valid basis to bypass it. Without examining the merits of the penalty orders, the Court relegated the petitioner to the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:26:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372077 The Kerala High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging penalty and recovery proceedings arising from detention of couriered goods and their later destruction in a fire, because an efficacious statutory remedy was available under Section 55 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Court accepted the objection that the petitioner should pursue the prescribed appellate process and found no valid basis to bypass it. Without examining the merits of the penalty orders, the Court relegated the petitioner to the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372077