<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1676 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the validity of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It affirmed the applicability of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) and confirmed the penalty levy of Rs. 7,66,320. The Tribunal found no violation of natural justice in the penalty notice and rejected the contention regarding the specificity of charges in the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1676 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the validity of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It affirmed the applicability of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) and confirmed the penalty levy of Rs. 7,66,320. The Tribunal found no violation of natural justice in the penalty notice and rejected the contention regarding the specificity of charges in the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>