<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1777 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277684</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty on the Respondent under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 from Rs. 20 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs. The Court found that the reduction was justified as smuggling was proven through circumstantial evidence and the kingpin of the operation was not interrogated. Consequently, the Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s decision reasonable, dismissing the appeal without any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1777 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277684</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty on the Respondent under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 from Rs. 20 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs. The Court found that the reduction was justified as smuggling was proven through circumstantial evidence and the kingpin of the operation was not interrogated. Consequently, the Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s decision reasonable, dismissing the appeal without any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>