https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277676 The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the returned income and rejected the comparables selected by the Transfer Pricing Officer for TP adjustment, deciding in favor of the assessee on significant grounds. Additional evidences were admitted under Rule 29, and the issue of interest levy under section 234 was deemed consequential. The order was pronounced on 18th October 2017. en-us Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:55:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277676 The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the returned income and rejected the comparables selected by the Transfer Pricing Officer for TP adjustment, deciding in favor of the assessee on significant grounds. Additional evidences were admitted under Rule 29, and the issue of interest levy under section 234 was deemed consequential. The order was pronounced on 18th October 2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277676